Web Application Testing
Assess authentication, authorization, sessions, input handling, business logic and common application security weaknesses.
Cyanous performs controlled penetration testing across applications, APIs, mobile platforms, networks and cloud environments to identify exploitable weaknesses, validate real-world impact and help teams strengthen their security posture.
We combine structured assessment, controlled exploitation and evidence-driven reporting so security teams can understand where weaknesses exist and what to address first.
Assess authentication, authorization, sessions, input handling, business logic and common application security weaknesses.
Test REST and other API interfaces for access-control flaws, injection, data exposure, abuse paths and authorization weaknesses.
Evaluate Android and iOS applications, local storage, communications, authentication, APIs and platform-specific security controls.
Assess exposed network services, segmentation, configurations and attack paths across internal or externally reachable infrastructure.
Review cloud-hosted attack surfaces, exposed services, identity controls, storage access and configuration-related security weaknesses.
Test identity flows, privilege boundaries, session handling, role enforcement and access-control assumptions.
Look beyond automated findings to identify workflow abuse, privilege escalation and application-specific security weaknesses.
Safely validate significant findings to distinguish exploitable weaknesses from lower-impact or non-actionable observations.
Provide clear evidence, risk context and practical technical recommendations that development and infrastructure teams can act on.
Penetration testing is most useful when the scope reflects real application architecture, users, integrations and exposed infrastructure.
Define authorized targets, testing windows, environments, exclusions and rules of engagement.
Map the approved attack surface, technologies, entry points and relevant trust boundaries.
Run structured tests across application, identity, API, network, mobile or cloud attack paths.
Safely reproduce significant weaknesses and collect evidence of practical security impact.
Correlate findings, affected assets, exploitability, business context and remediation priority.
Deliver technical evidence, affected areas, severity context and clear remediation recommendations.
Work with engineering and security teams to clarify fixes and mitigation approaches.
Reassess agreed findings to verify that remediation changes address the tested weakness.
Identify security issues that may expose applications, accounts, data or infrastructure to unauthorized activity.
Test whether authentication, authorization, segmentation and other controls work as intended under realistic conditions.
Give teams evidence and context to focus engineering effort on meaningful security risks.
Discover unnecessary exposure, weak configurations and overlooked entry points across connected systems.
Generate structured security-testing evidence that can support applicable customer, governance or compliance requirements.
Retest remediated findings to confirm that security changes address the originally identified weakness.
Assess customer portals, APIs, payment workflows, identity controls and sensitive financial data paths.
Test applications, APIs and connected systems that process sensitive operational and patient-related information.
Evaluate storefronts, accounts, checkout workflows, APIs, integrations and customer data exposure.
Assess enterprise applications, network exposure, connected services and operational technology interfaces where authorized.
Test shipment platforms, APIs, partner integrations, mobile applications and operational access controls.
Evaluate multi-tenant applications, APIs, authentication, cloud infrastructure and customer-facing attack surfaces.
Every engagement should balance meaningful security validation with safe execution, clear authorization and disciplined handling of sensitive findings.
We consider application behavior, business workflows and integrations rather than relying only on automated scanners.
Findings are documented so development, infrastructure and security teams can understand the technical path to remediation.
Testing can cover web, APIs, mobile, cloud and network environments as part of a connected assessment.
Significant findings are supported with reproducible evidence and clear affected-surface context.
Assessment, reporting, remediation guidance and retesting can be organized into a repeatable security workflow.
Use recurring assessments to track changing attack surfaces as applications, infrastructure and integrations evolve.
Tell us what environment you want to assess and where you need deeper security visibility.